What Real Censorship Looks Like

Frequently spearheaded by figures like Elon Musk, the political right often criticizes fact-checking and the suppression of hateful rhetoric on platforms like TwiXter as severe censorship. However, governmental censorship poses a far greater threat. Since Donald Trump initiated his purge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, climate change facts, and historical records of courageous women and men of color from Defense Department archives, we have witnessed a stark increase in actions that feed his authoritarian ambitions

As David French write in a NYTimes essay:

One of the most frustrating elements of our post-election national conversation was the insistence in some quarters that the election represented a repudiation of censorship and cancel culture. It did not.

Instead, nearly half the American people voted against the party that was actively moving away from extremism — including the far-left censorship regime that has long afflicted America’s elite campuses — and instead voted for the party that didn’t just weaponize government against dissenting voices (through book bansvarious anti-“woke” bills and prohibitions against drag shows), it also created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation against its political enemies.

The MAGA movement relentlessly attacked election workersschool board members and anyone else who defied its will to power or dissented from MAGA’s version of American history. Trumpian political correctness is becoming so absurd that The Associated Press reported on Thursday that at the Pentagon “tens of thousands of photos and online posts” have been “marked for deletion,” including a photo of Enola Gay, the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, presumably because its name included the word “gay.”

I spent much of my legal career combating censorship and defending free speech and religious liberty. I defended people from across the political spectrum, but I was also very familiar with censorship from the left. I filed lawsuit after lawsuit against universities that, among other things, imposed speech codesdiscriminated against Christian student groups and retaliated against conservative professors.

When I filed those cases, I believed the American right had a basic commitment to individual freedom. Today, it does not. It is far more committed to fighting the left now than it was to defending liberty then. As the right rejected libertarianism, it turned against the First Amendment.

And now Trump’s administration and his MAGA movement are the most dangerous and powerful censors in the United States.

When an administration blatantly attacks the First Amendment, it attacks our national identity. The First Amendment is core to the idea of the United States of America. The Supreme Court has protected it even in our nation’s darkest and most dangerous moments.

Read the full essay.

The Wood Chipper Distraction

Do not be distracted, the wood chipper is not about waste. It’s crucial not to be misled: the focus on cutting programs like food stamps is not genuinely about eliminating waste. While the ostensible goal may be to root out waste and fraud, the selective scrutiny applied by Elon Musk’s administration tells a different story.

Programs vital to low-income Americans are being disproportionately targeted. Yes, like any large program, there may be inefficiencies or even fraud within food assistance programs. However, this focus obscures a more significant issue: the lack of scrutiny applied to far more costly initiatives.

Take, for instance, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s subsidy programs, which funnel over $20 billion annually to predominantly affluent farmers. As highlighted by Michael Grunwald’s guest essay in The New York Times, these beneficiaries also enjoy a plethora of additional supports: subsidized loans, minimal-condition loans, price supports, import quotas that artificially inflate food prices, generous ad hoc aid for weather and market fluctuations, and mandates that promote environmentally harmful biofuels.

Since the real goal is to further redistribute wealth to the wealthy, these unfair programs are left in place.